home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.doit.wisc.edu!agnew
- From: agnew@cae.wisc.edu (Eric Agnew)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: q: better to soup-up A2k, or wait for new one and junk it?
- Date: 10 Apr 1996 16:42:20 GMT
- Organization: University of Wisconsin - College of Engineering
- Message-ID: <4kgodc$mma@news.doit.wisc.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: hp-169.cae.wisc.edu
-
- Would it be better (i.e. more effective, feasible, etc.) to add a ton
- of extras to a 2000 (i.e. 060/50, 24b graphics & 16-bit sound cards,
- extra RAM, etc.), or wait (indefinitely?) for a 64-bit systems to come
- out? I've read a few posts saying that people prefer their highly-
- upgraded 2000s to their 4000s... <shrug> Only thing is, how much can
- one upgrade without eventually losing out on some of the new technology?
- Then again, if new systems are being shipped w/ 030s... <sigh> What will
- be the new equivalent of the highest-end 4000T?
-
- L8er...
- -Eric
-
- --
- URL- http://www.engr.wisc.edu/~agnew (/sp.html) | Smashing Pumpkins FAQ mtnr.
- "i know i'll make it, love can last forever/ graceful swans of never topple
- to the earth/ and you can make it last, forever you" -SP, thirty-three
-